In a surprising turn of events, UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin announced that he will not seek reelection in 2027, just one hour after implementing controversial changes to the governing body’s statutes. These changes, which extend term limits, would have allowed Ceferin to continue his presidency. This move has raised eyebrows and intensified the ongoing debate surrounding his leadership.
Ceferin took the helm of UEFA in 2016 and has since faced numerous challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of a rival Super League. In a news conference following the vote on the amendments, Ceferin expressed his exhaustion, stating that he was “tired of COVID, tired of two wars,” and referred to the Super League as a “nonsense project.” This sentiment reflects the frustration he has experienced over the course of his presidency.
The vote on the amendments took place at UEFA’s Congress in Paris and saw the changes passed with an overwhelming majority. The English Football Association’s chief, Mark Bullingham, was the lone representative to vote against the amendments, while Ukraine’s FA abstained. However, despite the positive outcome for Ceferin, there is a sense of division within UEFA.
Ceferin acknowledged these divisions, stating, “UEFA is divided, I’ve heard,” but quickly dismissed claims that the organization is “fragmented beyond repair.” Despite the success of the vote, it is evident that there are differing opinions and tensions among UEFA’s members. The passing of the amendments may have temporarily united them, but the underlying divisions remain.
Perhaps the most unexpected part of Ceferin’s announcement was his intention to step down in 2027. He revealed that he had made this decision around six months prior, citing the need for fresh blood within the organization and the desire to spend more time with his family. His decision not to disclose his intentions earlier was influenced by a desire to see the true colors of those around him.
Ceferin expressed his weariness with the challenges he has faced during his tenure, including COVID-19, conflicts, and the Super League controversy. Additionally, he criticized “self-proclaimed moral authorities” who prioritize personal interests over the greater good. This public statement reflects the frustrations and disillusionment that Ceferin has undoubtedly experienced throughout his presidency.
The Backlash and Questions of Legitimacy
The amendments implemented by Ceferin have not come without criticism. Zvonimir Boban, UEFA’s former chief of football, resigned in protest back in January, accusing Ceferin of abandoning his values. In response, Ceferin dismissed Boban’s resignation as “pathetic” and “narcissistic” and claimed that Boban was aware of his plans to step down in 2027.
Ceferin defends the amendments by arguing that the previous statutes were illegitimate since they were passed without the vote of UEFA’s Congress. While Ceferin may have a valid point, the controversy surrounding his changes and the subsequent resignation does raise questions about his leadership and the legitimacy of the amendments themselves.
As Ceferin prepares to step down in 2027, his tenure as UEFA president will undoubtedly leave a lasting impact on European football. His reign has been marked by controversy, challenges, and significant changes that have both united and divided the organization.
While his decision not to seek reelection may come as a surprise to some, it is a testament to his belief that fresh leadership is needed. However, the controversy surrounding the amendments and the divisions within UEFA cast a shadow over his legacy. Only time will tell how history will judge Aleksander Ceferin and his controversial reign as UEFA president.