Mikel Arteta, the Arsenal manager, recently found himself in hot water with the Football Association as a result of his post-match comments following Arsenal’s 1-0 defeat to Newcastle United. Arteta expressed his frustration and disappointment with the VAR process, calling it a “disgrace” and “embarrassing.” These comments led to a charge of misconduct by the FA, claiming that Arteta’s remarks were insulting towards match officials, detrimental to the game, and brought the game into disrepute.
The FA’s Findings
After a thorough investigation, an independent commission cleared Arteta of the FA charge. In their written reasons, the commission described Arteta as an “impressive witness” and acknowledged that his comments were not specifically targeting a match official. They recognized that Arteta’s frustration was directed towards the VAR process and the standard of refereeing and decision-making in the Premier League. According to the commission, Arteta’s comments expressed a reasonable view shared by others that improvements are needed in the VAR system and officiating standards.
The written reasons also shed light on an interesting aspect of Arteta’s comments. It was revealed that former Arsenal midfielder Joe Willock, now playing for Newcastle, informed his ex-team-mates that he believed the ball had gone out of play in the build-up to Gordon’s goal. Additionally, Arteta’s use of the word “disgrace” had a different meaning in Spanish. The commission highlighted that the Spanish word “desgracia” has connotations of misfortune, tragedy, or bad luck, rather than suggesting contempt, dishonor, or disrespect as the English equivalent does. This linguistic understanding is crucial in interpreting the true intent behind Arteta’s choice of words.
Implications for the VAR Process
The decision to clear Arteta of the FA charge brings attention to the ongoing debates surrounding the VAR process. Arteta’s frustration resonated with many who have expressed similar concerns about the consistency and accuracy of VAR decisions. While the VAR system was introduced to minimize errors in officiating, it has faced criticism for creating confusion and prolonging decision-making processes.
Arteta’s case highlights the urgent need for enhancement in the VAR system and officiating standards. It is clear that both players and managers are discontented with the inconsistencies and delays caused by the current implementation of VAR. The focus should be on improving the technology and ensuring that it is used effectively to aid referees’ decision-making rather than hindering the flow of the game.
An Opportunity for Change
The FA’s decision to clear Arteta should serve as a catalyst for change within football’s governing bodies. It is crucial to engage in constructive dialogue and actively address the issues raised by managers, players, and fans alike. This incident presents an opportunity for stakeholders to come together and work towards a more transparent, consistent, and efficient VAR system that benefits the beautiful game.
Mikel Arteta’s post-match comments and subsequent FA charge have sparked important conversations about the VAR process. The FA’s decision to clear Arteta of the charge highlights the underlying frustrations with the current system and the need for improvement. This incident should prompt football’s governing bodies to take immediate action and collaborate with stakeholders to make necessary changes to ensure a fair and effective VAR system.